Seba and Musa

They're aimed at different problems: Musa is a hosted platform for curated AI tours, and Seba is a lighter object guide that recognizes an exhibit from a photo and discusses it.

Musa Guide

Seba

Getting started

Scan a QR code or reuse existing guide numbers. Audio starts at once, with no permission prompts.

Open the web app, then allow the camera (and the mic for voice).

Finding the exhibit

A curated route with location-aware prompts, entered by QR code or number at each stop. Its web site doesn't mention photo recognition.

The visitor photographs any object, and it's matched to your reference photos. No signage is needed.

Experience

A guided tour plus open questions, with context kept across the whole visit.

An introduction and Q&A per exhibit. Context resets at each new exhibit, and there's no route.

Content setup

Upload catalogues, PDFs and floorplans. Musa builds a knowledge graph, and you set routes, personas and guardrails in its Studio tool.

Staff add reference photos and a text description per exhibit on a simple admin page.

Answer control

A closed knowledge base with guardrails, citations and review before publishing. Open Q&A can be switched off.

Answers come from the description. A venue setting limits or widens knowledge. There are no citations or review workflow.

Languages and voice

40+ languages from one source.

4 (English, German, French, Spanish), using the phone's built-in voices. More can be added.  Voice input works only on Chrome for Android and Safari on iPhone.

Analytics

Dwell time, tour completion, top questions by gallery, revenue.

Dwell time, tour path, Identify failure rate.

Offline

Tour audio plays offline. Live answers pause without a connection.

Needs a connection.

Business side

Revenue share, £500/month or prepaid from £1,000, with built-in payments and ticketing/CRM links.

Not productized, and it serves a single venue.

Track record

Live at Museo Miraflores, where it launched in eight weeks with roughly 5x higher uptake than handheld devices and sessions over 40 minutes, per Musa's internal data. It also claims a 2025 blooloop award.

Proof of concept

Musa: strengths

·         Proven in service: It's a live, paid deployment with staff-facing tools for analytics and payments.

·         Answer trust: Guardrails and citations, plus curated storytelling, are a strong answer to "can we trust the AI?"

·         Low visitor friction: There's nothing to install and no permission prompts.

Musa: weak points

·         Mostly self-reported: The results and award come from Musa itself, and I found no independent test of answer accuracy or voice quality.

·         Setup effort: It needs QR codes or numbers at every stop plus curated content, over a few weeks of onboarding.

·         Ongoing cost and dependence: It's a rented platform. It offers export, but you don't control the code.

·         Framing: Musa's marketing calls object-level chatbots "one painting at a time", which is Seba's category, so expect that critique.

Seba: strengths

·         Photo recognition: It works on any object with no QR codes or labels, and staff can add a new exhibit in minutes.

·         Personalization: Visitors set age group, knowledge level, response length and language.

·         Staff tools: They include an Identify test tab with feedback, plus duplicate-photo warnings.

·         Ownership and cost: You own the code and data, and running costs are low.

Seba: weak points

·         Identification is the weakest link: Look-alike exhibits, glare and bad lighting can fool it. Your own test log showed a confident wrong match, so each exhibit needs several varied photos.

·         No tour structure: There's no route or "what next" guidance, and context resets per exhibit.

·         No offline mode and no analytics dashboard.

·         Narrow reach: It has 4 languages and depends on the phone's built-in voices.

·         Thin content controls: There are no guardrails, citations or review step, and nothing that imports catalogues or PDFs.

·         Single venue: One shared admin key protects everything.

·         Unproven at scale.

Coming next